Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- rfc_6458_sctp_socket_api_issues [2020/04/20 15:36] – tuexen
+++ rfc_6458_sctp_socket_api_issues [2020/04/20 15:42] (current) – tuexen
@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 Section 3.2 Non-Blocking Mode
-  * ... by the SCTP_ASSOC_CHANGE event with SCTP_COMM_UP or SCTP_CANT_START_ASSOC. If user data could not be sent (due to an SCTP_CANT_START_ASSOC),...
+  * ... by the ''SCTP_ASSOC_CHANGE'' event with ''SCTP_COMM_UP'' or ''SCTP_CANT_START_ASSOC''. If user data could not be sent (due to an ''SCTP_CANT_START_ASSOC''),...
   * [[https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6112|Errata 6112]]
 Section 6.1.1 SCTP_ASSOC_CHANGE
-  * sac_info: If sac_state is SCTP_COMM_LOST or SCTP_CANT_STR_ASSOC and an ABORT chunk was...
+  * ''sac_info'': If ''sac_state'' is ''SCTP_COMM_LOST'' or ''SCTP_CANT_STR_ASSOC'' and an ABORT chunk was...
   * [[https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6113|Errata 6113]]
 Section 6.1.2 SCTP_PEER_ADDR_CHANGE
-  * spc_state: A definition for SCTP_ADDR_CONFIRMED is missing. This is supported by FreeBSD and Linux, not by Solaris (yet).
+  * ''spc_state'': A definition for ''SCTP_ADDR_CONFIRMED'' is missing. This is supported by FreeBSD and Linux, not by Solaris (yet).
   * [[https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6116|Errata 6116]]
 Section 6.1.7 SCTP_PARTIAL_DELIVERY_EVENT
-  * uint16_t pdapi_stream;
+  * ''uint16_t pdapi_stream;''
-  * uint16_t pdapi_seq;
+  * ''uint16_t pdapi_seq;''
+  * Linux and Solaris implement it using ''uint32_t'' as specified, allthough ''uint16_t'' makes sense. FreeBSD uses ''uint16_t''.
 Section 8.2.1 SCTP_STATUS
-  * SCTP_BOUND doesn't make sense as an association state.
+  * ''SCTP_BOUND'' doesn't make sense as an association state.
   * [[https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6115|Errata 6115]]
 Section 9.5 sctp_getladdrs()
-  * If the id field is set to the value SCTP_FUTURE_ASSOC, then the locally bound...
+  * If the ''id'' field is set to the value ''SCTP_FUTURE_ASSOC'', then the locally bound...
   * [[https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6114|Errata 6114]]